Skip to content
For regulatory & clinical writing teams

The chat-native studio
for regulatory
writers.

Stop editing alone. Generate, refine, search, review, and QC CSRs, PSURs, and CERs in one conversation — with an agent that lives in your draft.

Or email us directly →
PART 11–READY ARCHITECTURESOC 2 READYYOUR SOURCES, YOUR PERIMETER
Audit-ready run bundles

Purpose-built for regulated writing — agentic retrieval, closed-system drafting, end-of-run QC, and two-level citations by default.

Asthra is the chat-native studio for regulatory writers. Life-sciences teams generate, refine, search, and QC first drafts of CSRs, PSURs, and CERs — with CMC Module 3 in active development — from writer-specified source documents inside Microsoft Word. Every output is grounded in your evidence, cited at the sentence level, and packaged with an end-of-run QC report and a regulatory-grade run bundle.

Built for

Teams working in regulated life‑sciences documentation.

The status quo

Regulatory writing is still slow,
manual, and repetitive.

Generic AI doesn't fix it — it adds new risk. Teams need leverage, not chatbots.

01 / Blank-page tax

Writers start from blank templates

Each document begins with manual review of protocols, trial data, and prior reports. Critical context lives across dozens of files — hours of synthesis before writing can begin.

02 / Capacity drain

Grunt work consumes writing capacity

Copy-paste, rewriting sections across documents, summarizing data tables, reformatting into templates. Seasoned writers spend 60% of their time on mechanical tasks instead of judgment.

03 / Trust deficit

Generic AI introduces new risks

General-purpose chatbots hallucinate, lose grounding in source material, and leave reviewers with no way to verify claims. In a regulated submission, unverifiable content is worse than no content.

04 / Compounding pressure

Timelines compress, effort keeps rising

Regulatory deadlines tighten while document complexity grows. Teams hire more writers and add overtime, but cycle times don't improve — the underlying process stays manual.

The Asthra promise

Accelerate drafting —
without breaking compliance.

Asthra helps life-sciences teams generate structured first drafts from source content, with writer-defined provenance, on-demand citations, and human-in-the-loop review — so writers focus on judgment, not grunt work.

At a glance

What Asthra delivers.

Chat-native studio

One conversation, one document. See every section's state at a glance, ask any question in plain language, and approve consequential actions before they happen. No mode-switching between panels.

Walk-away drafting

Start the run, step away. Asthra lands a first draft with bibliography, hyperlinks, and a QC report ready in 1–2 hours. Come back to the studio with the full agent history, every tool call, and every gap flag in view — then review, refine, and finalise right where the agent left off. The draft is a starting point, not the finish line.

Tables & figures, in the chat

Ask the agent to summarise an adverse-event line listing, build a frequency table by system organ class, or chart sales exposure over time. Deterministic Python runs the analysis — every step audit-logged — and the resulting table or figure drops straight into the draft. No manual filtering, no LLM-fabricated numbers.

Literature search in the draft

Ask the agent mid-draft to find recent papers on a topic; it queries PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv in parallel and surfaces citation-ready results — every external lookup writer-approved and ledger-logged.

Reviewer personas as skills

Summon an FDA Clinical Reviewer, CMC Reviewer, CER Device Reviewer, or CSR Writer QC over any section. Personas are SME-authored as markdown skills — your domain experts extend the studio, no engineering required.

Hyperlinks at draft time

Every “see Table 14.3.1.2” is wired to a stable anchor as the section is written, not weeks later in publishing. eCTD B21-ready cross-references that re-derive automatically when sections move.

End-of-run QC + run bundles

Every run finishes with a structured quality pass — checking cross-reference integrity, source-anchored claims, citation density, and gap detection — and ships as an audit-ready package: the draft itself plus the full trail of how it was produced.

How it works

An agent that plans, retrieves, drafts —
then a writer who reviews and hands off.

Five steps — every one of them auditable. The agent does steps 01–03; the writer drives step 04 with skills and reviewer personas; step 05 seals and delivers.

STEP / 01

Plan

The agent produces a retrieval plan: which source files and sections it intends to use for each part of the document. Review and approve the plan before drafting begins.

STEP / 02

Retrieve

Semantic retrieval pulls the right excerpts from your uploaded documents. No unsupervised internet access — any external lookup pauses for explicit writer approval and is logged in the ledger. Nothing from model training memory. Only your evidence, on your terms.

STEP / 03

Draft

Asthra drafts each section against module-specific writing instructions your team validated during onboarding. Missing data is flagged inline, never fabricated. The first draft lands in Word with the citation graph already wired.

STEP / 04

Review & refine

The writer drives the draft to finished. Refine through chat. Summon reviewer personas — FDA Clinical, CMC, CER Device, CSR Writer QC — over any section. Pull recent literature mid-draft. Run end-of-run QC. The studio is where the writer finalises.

STEP / 05

Hand off

Seal the run as an audit-ready bundle: the .docx, per-section provenance, the QC report, and a run manifest. Every claim traces back to source. The ledger stays with the document — portable, vendor-independent.

Chat mode

Chat with your draft
after it's written.

After the first draft lands, Asthra stays in the document with you. Ask why it cited a particular passage, which sources it compared, or whether a claim has supporting evidence. Tell it to rework §4.1, tighten a summary, or swap one source for another.

Every refinement is logged, every citation updates automatically, and every edit goes through the same closed-system retrieval that produced the original draft.

W
Why did you cite Protocol §8.2 and not the SAP here?
A
Protocol §8.2 defines the primary endpoint; the SAP derives the analysis method. The endpoint description belongs in §9.3 of the CSR, so I sourced it from the protocol. Want me to add a cross-reference to SAP §3.1 for the analysis population?
W
Yes, and shorten the paragraph to 80 words.

Illustrative chat. Real conversations happen inside the Word add-in.

Use cases

Where teams use Asthra today — and what's coming next.

DOC / CSR

Clinical Study Reports

Full CSR first draft from trial protocol and TFL set. ICH E3 aligned.

Learn more →
DOC / PROTOCOL

Clinical Trial Protocols

ICH M11–structured protocols from your concept, IB, and analysis strategy. Estimands kept consistent.

Learn more →
DOC / IB

Investigator's Brochures

ICH E6(R3) IBs synchronising toxicology, human PK, and reference safety information.

Learn more →
DOC / PSUR

PSUR / PBRER (pharma)

Aggregate safety reports from historical PSURs, CDS, exposure and safety data. ICH E2C(R2) aligned.

Learn more →
DOC / DSUR

DSUR (investigational)

ICH E2F development safety update reports from study-level safety data, exposure, RSI, and the prior DSUR.

Learn more →
DOC / PSUR · DEVICE

Device PSURs

EU MDR PSURs integrating sales, vigilance, PMCF, and literature into one safety narrative.

Learn more →
DOC / CER

Clinical Evaluation Reports

CERs for medical devices — EU MDR aligned. From literature review to PMS integration.

Learn more →
DOC / ICF

Informed Consent Forms

Adult and pediatric ICFs — 21 CFR 50 and EU CTR compliant, in genuine lay language.

Learn more →
DOC / CRF

Case Report Forms

CDISC CDASH–aligned CRFs from your protocol, with fields that map cleanly to SDTM.

Learn more →
DOC / BRIEFING

Briefing Documents

Pre-IND and Advisory Committee packages — benefit-risk narrative, positions on FDA questions.

Learn more →
DOC / CMC
Coming Q3 2026

CMC (Module 3)

Consolidate BMRs, CoAs, specifications, and stability data into structured Module 3 content. In active development.

Learn more →
Near-term roadmap
RMP / EU RMP — Risk Management PlansSmPC & Patient Information Leaflet (UK/EU)FDA Type B/C/D Briefings & EMA Scientific AdviceModule 2 Clinical Overview & Summary (eCTD)Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP)Biologics CMC (Module 3.2.S / 3.2.P)Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) & FDA Annual Report
Designed for regulated environments

Trust, transparency, and compliance.

Uses only the sources you provide

Closed to the internet by default and to model memory. Asthra operates within your data perimeter; external lookups require writer approval and are logged in the ledger. No source contaminates the output without your sign-off.

Flags missing or inconsistent data

When source documents contain gaps or contradictions, Asthra surfaces them explicitly — instead of papering over them with plausible-sounding text.

Two levels of traceability

Document-level provenance for every section, plus on-demand sentence-level citations with file, page, and passage. Every generated claim is audit-traceable.

Validation & compliance posture

GDPR and HIPAA compliant. SOC 2 Type 1 and ISO 27001 ready. SOC 2 Type 2 and EU AI Act in progress. Deploy as managed SaaS or in your own VPC.

Voices from the field

In active use with pharma and medical-device teams.

Named references available on request.

Pharmacovigilance teams are under increasing pressure to do more with greater speed and consistency. Asthra applies AI in a thoughtful, compliance-aware manner — automating the heavy lifting while keeping expert oversight central.

VD
Varun Dua
Founder, PV Analytica — safety and pharmacovigilance advisory
A 30-day pilot

See Asthra on your documents.

Request a live demo and we'll match Asthra's output, side-by-side, against your existing process — and show you the writer-hours saved, line for line.